DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2007 Mazda CX-7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
166ModelCX-7
2007Model year2007
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
222 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
175 HPPower238 HP
330 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank69 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4675 mm
1800 mmWidth1872 mm
1416 mmHeight1645 mm
1580 KgWeight1802 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2007 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…