DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2003 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
166ModelS60
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
222 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
175 HPPower200 HP
330 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4576 mm
1800 mmWidth1804 mm
1416 mmHeight1428 mm
1580 KgWeight1534 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2003 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…