DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Astro vs 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMercury
AstroModelMountaineer
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
192 HPPower239 HP
339 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank85 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size245/70 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4844 mm
1969 mmWidth1831 mm
1903 mmHeight1806 mm
2025 KgWeight1891 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Astro and 2002 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…