DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Astro vs 2002 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
AstroModelEconoline
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
192 HPPower228 HP
339 NmTorque393 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank132 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength5382 mm
1969 mmWidth2014 mm
1903 mmHeight2050 mm
2025 KgWeight—
2825 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Astro and 2002 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…