DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2002 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
166ModelHarrier
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
305 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size215/70 R16 99S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4575 mm
1815 mmWidth1815 mm
1416 mmHeight1665 mm
1490 KgWeight1660 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2002 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…