DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Chevrolet Astra vs 1999 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
AstraModelFTO
1999Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
101 HPPower126 HP
230 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption17,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4110 mmLength4320 mm
1710 mmWidth1735 mm
1430 mmHeight1300 mm
1250 KgWeight1100 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Chevrolet Astra and 1999 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…