DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Astra vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMG
AstraModelZS
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
186 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
110 HPPower117 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4110 mmLength4520 mm
1709 mmWidth1700 mm
1430 mmHeight1390 mm
1060 KgWeight1125 Kg
2614 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Astra and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…