2014 • Chery
Tiggo 3
Chery Tiggo 3 1.6 (126 Hp) 2014Overall Score66.25/100
2014 Chery Tiggo 3 vs 1998 Rover 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Rover
200
Rover 200 1998Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Chery Tiggo 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7.75 points.
66.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chery Tiggo 3SpecificationRover 200
CheryMakeRover
Tiggo 3Model200
2014Model year1998
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Chery Tiggo 3SpecificationRover 200
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
175 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
126 HPPower145 HP
160 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chery Tiggo 3SpecificationRover 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chery Tiggo 3SpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R17Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chery Tiggo 3SpecificationRover 200
4419 mmLength3973 mm
1765 mmWidth1688 mm
1651 mmHeight1419 mm
1380 KgWeight1135 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Chery Tiggo 3 and 1998 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chery Tiggo 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…