DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2014 Tata Bolt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeTata
Sweet (QQ)ModelBolt
2013Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
140 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
53 HPPower90 HP
83 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank44 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size175/65 R14

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3825 mm
1508 mmWidth1695 mm
1491 mmHeight1562 mm
850 KgWeight1095 Kg
—Wheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2014 Tata Bolt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…