DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2014 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeSmart
Sweet (QQ)ModelFortwo
2013Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
140 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement999 cc
53 HPPower71 HP
83 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank28 lt
—Urban consumption5,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size165/65 R 15; 185/60 R 15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength2695 mm
1508 mmWidth1663 mm
1491 mmHeight1552 mm
850 KgWeight900 Kg
—Wheelbase1873 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2014 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…