DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2012 ZAZ Sens Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeZAZ
Sweet (QQ)ModelSens
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
140 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
53 HPPower70 HP
83 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size—

Dimensions

3550 mmLength4074 mm
1508 mmWidth1678 mm
1491 mmHeight1432 mm
850 KgWeight1182 Kg
—Wheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2012 ZAZ Sens approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…