DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2012 Skoda Citigo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeSkoda
Sweet (QQ)ModelCitigo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
140 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement999 cc
53 HPPower60 HP
83 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3563 mm
1508 mmWidth1641 mm
1491 mmHeight1478 mm
850 KgWeight932 Kg
—Wheelbase2420 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2012 Skoda Citigo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…