DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2012 Peugeot 301 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakePeugeot
Sweet (QQ)Model301
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
140 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
53 HPPower72 HP
83 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength4442 mm
1508 mmWidth1748 mm
1491 mmHeight1466 mm
850 KgWeight980 Kg
—Wheelbase2652 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2012 Peugeot 301 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…