DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2011 Citroen C1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeCitroen
Sweet (QQ)ModelC1
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3/5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,6 s
140 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
53 HPPower54 HP
83 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,4 lt
—Average consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size155/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3435 mm
1508 mmWidth1630 mm
1491 mmHeight1465 mm
850 KgWeight890 Kg
—Wheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2011 Citroen C1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…