DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2010 Fiat Qubo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeFiat
Sweet (QQ)ModelQubo
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
140 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1360 cc
53 HPPower73 HP
83 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3959 mm
1508 mmWidth1716 mm
1491 mmHeight1735 mm
850 KgWeight1255 Kg
—Wheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2010 Fiat Qubo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…