DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2008 Lancia Ypsilon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeLancia
Sweet (QQ)ModelYpsilon
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
140 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
53 HPPower60 HP
83 NmTorque102 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt
—Average consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3778 mm
1508 mmWidth1704 mm
1491 mmHeight1530 mm
850 KgWeight945 Kg
—Wheelbase2388 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2008 Lancia Ypsilon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…