DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2008 Hyundai i10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeHyundai
Sweet (QQ)Modeli10
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,6 s
140 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1086 cc
53 HPPower67 HP
83 NmTorque98 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3565 mm
1508 mmWidth1595 mm
1491 mmHeight1540 mm
850 KgWeight1000 Kg
—Wheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2008 Hyundai i10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…