DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2006 Citroen Berlingo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeCitroen
Sweet (QQ)ModelBerlingo
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
140 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
53 HPPower75 HP
83 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength4137 mm
1508 mmWidth1724 mm
1491 mmHeight1810 mm
850 KgWeight1125 Kg
—Wheelbase2693 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2006 Citroen Berlingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…