-2010-Teknik-Ozellikleri.jpg)
2010 • Chery
Kimo (A1)
Chery Kimo (A1) 1.3i (83 Hp) 2010Overall Score59.25/100
2010 Chery Kimo (A1) vs 2010 Toyota Probox Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.4 D (75 Hp) 2010Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Chery Kimo (A1)
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationToyota Probox
CheryMakeToyota
Kimo (A1)ModelProbox
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationToyota Probox
156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1297 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
83 HPPower75 HP
114 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationToyota Probox
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
Dimensions
Chery Kimo (A1)SpecificationToyota Probox
3700 mmLength4195 mm
1578 mmWidth1695 mm
1527 mmHeight1525 mm
1070 KgWeight1030 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Chery Kimo (A1) and 2010 Toyota Probox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chery Kimo (A1) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…