DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chery Kimo (A1) vs 2006 Holden Cruze Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeHolden
Kimo (A1)ModelCruze
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1297 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
83 HPPower100 HP
114 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
175/60 R14Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3700 mmLength3625 mm
1578 mmWidth1640 mm
1527 mmHeight1605 mm
1070 KgWeight1000 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chery Kimo (A1) and 2006 Holden Cruze approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…