DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Caterham Seven vs 1995 Geo Prizm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham Seven

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeGeo
SevenModelPrizm
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
115 HPPower106 HP
150 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3380 mmLength4395 mm
1580 mmWidth1685 mm
1120 mmHeight1355 mm
550 KgWeight1070 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Caterham Seven and 1995 Geo Prizm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham Seven leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…