DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Caterham CSR vs 2010 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeCitroen
CSRModelC5
2010Model year2010
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
225 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
200 HPPower204 HP
221 NmTorque440 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank71 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size245/45 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4829 mm
1685 mmWidth1860 mm
1140 mmHeight1491-1495 mm
565 KgWeight1767 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Caterham CSR and 2010 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…