DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Caterham CSR vs 2005 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeJaguar
CSRModelS-type
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
225 km/hTop speed228 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
221 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4861 mm
1685 mmWidth1819 mm
1140 mmHeight1441 mm
565 KgWeight1620 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Caterham CSR and 2005 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…