DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Caterham CSR vs 2005 Alpina D3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeAlpina
CSRModelD3
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
225 km/hTop speed238 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
221 NmTorque410 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank63 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size245/40 R18ZR; 265/40 R18ZR
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4520 mm
1685 mmWidth1817 mm
1140 mmHeight1413 mm
565 KgWeight1460 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Caterham CSR and 2005 Alpina D3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…