1994 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.8 i 16V U347WC (153 Hp) 1994Overall Score61.5/100
1994 Caterham 21 vs 1994 Mitsubishi RVR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Mitsubishi
RVR
Mitsubishi RVR 1.8 i 16V Z (120 Hp) 1994Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi RVR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
CaterhamMakeMitsubishi
21ModelRVR
1994Model year1994
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats4
2Doors4
Performance
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
5,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
153 HPPower120 HP
180 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
3800 mmLength4290 mm
1580 mmWidth1695 mm
1150 mmHeight1625 mm
650 KgWeight1210 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Caterham 21 and 1994 Mitsubishi RVR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi RVR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…