1997 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.8 i 16V (190 Hp) 1997Overall Score70.5/100
1997 Caterham 21 vs 1997 Mitsubishi RVR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mitsubishi
RVR
Mitsubishi RVR 2.0 i 16V Turbo (230 Hp) 1997Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Caterham 21
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
CaterhamMakeMitsubishi
21ModelRVR
1997Model year1997
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
5,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
190 HPPower230 HP
203 NmTorque343 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank58 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
3800 mmLength4280 mm
1580 mmWidth1695 mm
1150 mmHeight1650 mm
650 KgWeight1570 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Caterham 21 and 1997 Mitsubishi RVR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…