DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Caterham 21 vs 1994 Toyota Celica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeToyota
21ModelCelica
1995Model year1994
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

5,0 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
190 HPPower242 HP
203 NmTorque302 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size215/50 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4420 mm
1580 mmWidth1750 mm
1150 mmHeight1305 mm
650 KgWeight1390 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Caterham 21 and 1994 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…