1995 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.8 i 16V (190 Hp) 1995Overall Score70.5/100
1995 Caterham 21 vs 1995 Mazda RX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mazda
RX-7
Mazda RX-7 RX 1995Overall Score71.25/100
WINNER
Mazda RX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda RX-7
CaterhamMakeMazda
21ModelRX-7
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda RX-7
5,0 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
190 HPPower239 HP
203 NmTorque294 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda RX-7
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank76 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda RX-7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda RX-7
3800 mmLength4285 mm
1580 mmWidth1760 mm
1150 mmHeight1230 mm
650 KgWeight1280 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2465 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Caterham 21 and 1995 Mazda RX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda RX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…