DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Caterham 21 vs 1996 Audi Cabriolet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeAudi
21ModelCabriolet
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
124 HPPower115 HP
165 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
12 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4366 mm
1580 mmWidth1716 mm
1150 mmHeight1379 mm
650 KgWeight1350 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2556 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Caterham 21 and 1996 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…