1997 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.6 i 16V (133 Hp) 1997Overall Score55.5/100
1997 Caterham 21 vs 1997 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 1.8 (130 Hp) 1997Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda MX-5
CaterhamMakeMazda
21ModelMX-5
1997Model year1997
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda MX-5
6,0 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
133 HPPower130 HP
149 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda MX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda MX-5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size185/60 R14 82 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda MX-5
3800 mmLength3975 mm
1580 mmWidth1675 mm
1150 mmHeight1230 mm
650 KgWeight990 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2265 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Caterham 21 and 1997 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…