1996 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.6 i 16V (133 Hp) 1996Overall Score55.5/100
1996 Caterham 21 vs 1996 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
Galant
Mitsubishi Galant 1.8 i (135 Hp) 1996Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Galant
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi Galant
CaterhamMakeMitsubishi
21ModelGalant
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi Galant
6,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1829 cc
133 HPPower135 HP
149 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi Galant
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi Galant
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham 21SpecificationMitsubishi Galant
3800 mmLength4620 mm
1580 mmWidth1730 mm
1150 mmHeight1405 mm
650 KgWeight1200 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Caterham 21 and 1996 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…