DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Caterham 21 vs 1999 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeMazda
21ModelRoadster
1999Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeRoadster
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
150 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank48 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3800 mmLength3955 mm
1580 mmWidth1680 mm
1150 mmHeight1235 mm
650 KgWeight1010 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Caterham 21 and 1999 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…