DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Caterham 21 vs 1997 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeCitroen
21ModelSaxo
1997Model year1997
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
190 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
117 HPPower118 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank45 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength3718 mm
1580 mmWidth1595 mm
1150 mmHeight1368 mm
650 KgWeight935 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Caterham 21 and 1997 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…