1987 • Alfa Romeo
164
Alfa Romeo 164 3.0 V6 (184 Hp) 1987Overall Score64.5/100
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1988 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 3.1 V6 (141 Hp) 1988Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Alfa RomeoMakeOldsmobile
164ModelCutlass
1987Model year1988
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
8,1 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
184 HPPower141 HP
255 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption16 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R 15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4670 mmLength4921 mm
1760 mmWidth1804 mm
1390 mmHeight1391 mm
1470 KgWeight1450 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 and 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…