DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Cadillac STS vs 2016 Toyota Century Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac STS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

90.5–89.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeToyota
STSModelCentury
2011Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,2 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4999 cc
325 HPPower280 HP
420 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders12

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank95 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption20 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/45 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4985 mmLength5270 mm
1843 mmWidth1890 mm
1464 mmHeight1480 mm
1780 KgWeight1990 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Cadillac STS and 2016 Toyota Century approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac STS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…