DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Cadillac STS vs 2016 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac STS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

90.5–89.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeSsangYong
STSModelChairman
2011Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,2 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed245 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4966 cc
325 HPPower306 HP
420 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,4 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears7 T-tronic
255/45 R18Tyre size245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4985 mmLength5135 mm
1843 mmWidth1895 mm
1464 mmHeight1495 mm
1780 KgWeight1936 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase2970 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Cadillac STS and 2016 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac STS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…