DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac STS vs 2004 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLincoln
STSModelLS
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
229 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
258 HPPower284 HP
346 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4985 mmLength4925 mm
1843 mmWidth1860 mm
1464 mmHeight1450 mm
1782 KgWeight1710 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac STS and 2004 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…