DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac SRX vs 2005 Cadillac STS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac STS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

89.75–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeCadillac
SRXModelSTS
2004Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,2 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
324 HPPower325 HP
420 NmTorque420 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/60 R18; 255/55 R18Tyre size255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4985 mm
1845 mmWidth1843 mm
1670 mmHeight1464 mm
2045 KgWeight1780 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase2957 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac SRX and 2005 Cadillac STS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac STS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…