DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac SRX vs 2006 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

89.75–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeJaguar
SRXModelXJ
2004Model year2006
EstateBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,6 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
324 HPPower298 HP
420 NmTorque411 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank85 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption16 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/60 R18; 255/55 R18Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength5215 mm
1845 mmWidth1860 mm
1670 mmHeight1448 mm
2045 KgWeight1640 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase3159 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac SRX and 2006 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…