1996 • Cadillac
LSE
Cadillac LSE 3.0 i V6 24V (210 Hp) 1996Overall Score72.5/100
1996 Cadillac LSE vs 1997 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (203 Hp) 1997Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Cadillac LSESpecificationFord Taurus
CadillacMakeFord
LSEModelTaurus
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Cadillac LSESpecificationFord Taurus
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
210 HPPower203 HP
270 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Cadillac LSESpecificationFord Taurus
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R16VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Cadillac LSESpecificationFord Taurus
4890 mmLength5070 mm
1786 mmWidth1854 mm
1430 mmHeight1463 mm
1665 KgWeight1602 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2756 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Cadillac LSE and 1997 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Scorpio vs Cadillac LSE1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableInfiniti J30 vs Cadillac LSE1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda Sentia vs Cadillac LSE1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Taurus vs Cadillac LSE1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableMercury Sable vs Cadillac LSE1996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…