DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac Escalade vs 2009 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeChevrolet
EscaladeModelImpala
2004Model year2009
EstateBody typeSedan
8Seats5/6
5Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5328 ccEngine displacement5326 cc
299 HPPower303 HP
440 NmTorque438 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength5091 mm
2004 mmWidth1851 mm
1885 mmHeight1487 mm
2519 KgWeight1683 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2807 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac Escalade and 2009 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…