2004 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 6.0 i V8 (405 Hp) 2004Overall Score93.5/100
2004 Cadillac CTS vs 1999 Aston Martin DB7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Aston Martin
DB7
Aston Martin DB7 5.9i V12 48V (420 Hp) 1999Overall Score92.5/100
WINNER
Cadillac CTS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Cadillac CTSSpecificationAston Martin DB7
CadillacMakeAston Martin
CTSModelDB7
2004Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
4Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Cadillac CTSSpecificationAston Martin DB7
4,6 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
262 km/hTop speed298 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5935 cc
405 HPPower420 HP
536 NmTorque542 Nm
8Cylinders12
Fuel & Consumption
Cadillac CTSSpecificationAston Martin DB7
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank89 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption20 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Cadillac CTSSpecificationAston Martin DB7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/45 R18Tyre size245/40 R18; 265/35 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Cadillac CTSSpecificationAston Martin DB7
4864 mmLength4666 mm
1793 mmWidth1830 mm
1455 mmHeight1240 mm
1780 KgWeight1780 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2590 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Cadillac CTS and 1999 Aston Martin DB7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Cadillac CTS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…