DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Cadillac CTS vs 2012 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeSsangYong
CTSModelChairman
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3598 cc
304 HPPower250 HP
370 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption14,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,1 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears7 T-tronic
P235/50 R18Tyre size245/45 R19
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4789 mmLength5135 mm
1883 mmWidth1895 mm
1422 mmHeight1495 mm
—Weight1973 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2970 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Cadillac CTS and 2012 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…