DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Cadillac CTS vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLand Rover
CTSModelRange Rover
2017Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3649 ccEngine displacement3628 cc
340 HPPower271 HP
386 NmTorque630 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank105 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears6
245/45 R17; 245/40 R18; 275/35 R18; 255/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4966 mmLength4972 mm
1833 mmWidth—
1454 mmHeight1865 mm
1699 KgWeight—
2910 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Cadillac CTS and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…