DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Cadillac CTS vs 2009 Infiniti FX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Infiniti FX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeInfiniti
CTSModelFX
2010Model year2009
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed221 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
322 HPPower283 HP
373 NmTorque366 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank90 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears5
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4878 mmLength4803 mm
1842 mmWidth1925 mm
1473 mmHeight1674 mm
1857 KgWeight1960 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Cadillac CTS and 2009 Infiniti FX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Infiniti FX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…