DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Cadillac CTS vs 2006 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeChrysler
CTSModel300
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
238 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
223 HPPower218 HP
296 NmTorque510 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength5015 mm
1793 mmWidth1880 mm
1440 mmHeight1475 mm
1628 KgWeight1840 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Cadillac CTS and 2006 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…