DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac CTS vs 2006 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
CTSModelS80
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
238 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
223 HPPower238 HP
296 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4851 mm
1793 mmWidth1860 mm
1440 mmHeight1490 mm
1628 KgWeight1540 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac CTS and 2006 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…