DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac CTS vs 2004 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mark II

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeToyota
CTSModelMark II
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
238 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
223 HPPower220 HP
296 NmTorque296 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4735 mm
1793 mmWidth1760 mm
1440 mmHeight1460 mm
1628 KgWeight1550 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac CTS and 2004 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…