DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Cadillac CTS vs 2012 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLand Rover
CTSModelDiscovery
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2994 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
273 HPPower256 HP
302 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
235/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4866 mmLength4829 mm
1842 mmWidth—
1472 mmHeight1887 mm
1779 KgWeight—
2880 mmWheelbase2885 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Cadillac CTS and 2012 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…