2009 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 2.8L V6 SFI (211 Hp) 2009Overall Score76.5/100
2009 Cadillac CTS vs 2009 Volvo V70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.4 D5 (205 Hp) 2009Overall Score76.75/100
WINNER
Volvo V70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Cadillac CTSSpecificationVolvo V70
CadillacMakeVolvo
CTSModelV70
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Cadillac CTSSpecificationVolvo V70
8,3 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
225 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
211 HPPower205 HP
246 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Cadillac CTSSpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Cadillac CTSSpecificationVolvo V70
4829 mmLength4823 mm
1793 mmWidth—
1440 mmHeight1547 mm
1765 KgWeight1574 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2816 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Cadillac CTS and 2009 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableCitroen C5 vs Cadillac CTS2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableCitroen C6 vs Cadillac CTS2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableAlpina B3 vs Cadillac CTS2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableChrysler 300 vs Cadillac CTS2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableJeep Grand Cherokee vs Cadillac CTS2009 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…